Hi,
Thank you all for your answers.
In fact, I solved my problem using a local admin setup and AutoIT, as command-line only MSI installation was not working, even with the local context opened.
I don't have time to explore MSI caveats, but maybe I'll try one day ...
Regards
Die Suche ergab 21 Treffer
- 05 Jul 2017, 09:36
- Forum: Free support
- Thema: Strange winst behaviour
- Antworten: 9
- Zugriffe: 6676
- 29 Mai 2017, 17:07
- Forum: Free support
- Thema: Strange winst behaviour
- Antworten: 9
- Zugriffe: 6676
Re: Strange winst behaviour
The software is "LPKF CircuitPro PM". Winst version 4.11.5.20 is used. The command line used is something rather classical : [Winbatch_install] msiexec /i "LPKF CircuitPro PM 2.3.msi" /qb! /l* "$LogDir$\$ProductId$.install_log.txt" TARGETDIR="$InstallDir$" I h...
- 24 Mai 2017, 18:12
- Forum: Free support
- Thema: Strange winst behaviour
- Antworten: 9
- Zugriffe: 6676
Re: Strange winst behaviour
Thanks for your reply.
I also tried without AutoIT, with "/qf" flags. I can answer all the questions manually, and the installation is successfull if I run it logged in.
But if I let the agent perform it, I can answer the questions but the installation hangs.
I also tried without AutoIT, with "/qf" flags. I can answer all the questions manually, and the installation is successfull if I run it logged in.
But if I let the agent perform it, I can answer the questions but the installation hangs.
- 17 Mai 2017, 17:46
- Forum: Free support
- Thema: Strange winst behaviour
- Antworten: 9
- Zugriffe: 6676
Strange winst behaviour
Hi, I'm experiencing something rather strange with a new installation I am trying to perform (a simple MSI) : if I run my script logged on Windows (admin) and using winst32, it works perfectly. But if I ask OPSI to install the product running the very same script, on next reboot or by executing it i...
- 28 Jun 2016, 11:55
- Forum: Free support
- Thema: Meaning of an error message
- Antworten: 1
- Zugriffe: 1903
Meaning of an error message
Hi,
Can someone explain the following message :
Exception in CreateAndProcessScript: Handling AktionslisteRange check error
Regards
Can someone explain the following message :
Exception in CreateAndProcessScript: Handling AktionslisteRange check error
Regards
- 17 Jun 2016, 13:07
- Forum: Free support
- Thema: Product setup timeout
- Antworten: 4
- Zugriffe: 3595
Re: Product setup timeout
Thanks for your reply ! It reads to me like you have one client and then only change the mac address to install another client with the same settings. I would advise against this if you ever want to know what exactly is installed on one client! You may also run into problems and unnecessary work whe...
- 17 Jun 2016, 09:16
- Forum: Free support
- Thema: Build boot image
- Antworten: 5
- Zugriffe: 4262
Re: Build boot image
Hi,
No, they aren't. I think it's because another tool is used for inventory management. OSPI is only used for OS and software deployments.
No, they aren't. I think it's because another tool is used for inventory management. OSPI is only used for OS and software deployments.
- 16 Jun 2016, 20:32
- Forum: Free support
- Thema: Product setup timeout
- Antworten: 4
- Zugriffe: 3595
Product setup timeout
Hi, I'll have to deploy more than 100 clients in a near future, and most of them consist in hardware renewal. Thank to OPSI capabilities, I just have to change a MAC address and I can get the existing products selections. Very nice ! But when I tried to install a dozen of machines concurrently, I ex...
- 09 Jun 2016, 15:47
- Forum: Free support
- Thema: Build boot image
- Antworten: 5
- Zugriffe: 4262
Re: Build boot image
Hi, I finally managed to update the netboot product and use the most recent bootimage. But I have another problem : is there a way to "prune" the hardware records ? I deleted the old machine, but when I recreate it, many parameters still remain (fomrer MAC address, the NIC of the new machi...
- 08 Jun 2016, 13:30
- Forum: Free support
- Thema: Build boot image
- Antworten: 5
- Zugriffe: 4262
Re: Build boot image
Thanks for your reply.
If I use "opsi-backup", I can safely revert back to the currently used version ? I don't have much informations, but my predecessor seems to have tweak a few things and I would like to be able to go back if I can't port them in a newer version.
If I use "opsi-backup", I can safely revert back to the currently used version ? I don't have much informations, but my predecessor seems to have tweak a few things and I would like to be able to go back if I can't port them in a newer version.